A Twitter follower tipped me off to something I missed yesterday while taking care of out-of-state business. (A visit to Detroit in April, hold your envy and jealousy.) There seems to be a rift between longtime Minnesota Timberwolves scribe Britt Robson and the lovely Dawn Mitchell.
I'm still not clear what the sticking point is, I can only guess, but there are a few clues.
Robson wrote this exhaustive analysis of what has gone down in the world of Timberwolves basketball, and brought up the name of Mitchell (the reporter) regarding the dismissal of Sam Mitchell (the season-long interim head coach). The female Mitchell earned a paragraph in Robson's analysis:
"It wasn’t until the game was already underway that Fox 9 reporter Dawn Mitchell (no relation to the coach) who only tangentially covers the Wolves beat, was the first to report that Mitchell would not be included in the coaching search. Regular beat writers Zgoda and AP’s Jon Krawcyznski had details of the Korn Ferry search firm by then, but no specifics on Mitchell’s future."
This didn't settle well with our blonde sports reporter, (who inexplicably has a Facebook fan page with over 95,000 likes). There seemed to be a Twitter dispute about Robson's writing.
As best I can tell the third-string sports reporter didn't like the characterization that she broke the news after the final 2015-16 Timberwolves game was underway. Her tweets indicate that she disputed the timing of her report. (She insisted that she reported the tidbit before the final game began.) It also appears she didn't like the characterization that her coverage of the team is tangential.
The somewhat challenging to follow Twitter exchange between Robson and the backup sports reporter at Fox 9 is hard to handicap. It became increasingly unclear to me as to whether or not D-Mitch was the first to report the interim head coach's fate. And whether she was or wasn't, ultimately I don't care. But her apparent pettiness is too rich to resist.
It appears that the blonde backup didn't like the tangential description of her coverage. Whether it's fair or not, I'm unclear as to why it was an important characterization to Robson's analysis. Was it to cast doubt upon the accuracy of her reporting? Was it to applaud somebody who allegedly doesn't document the team's fate as exhaustively as others? It's a bizarre description of her coverage, either way.
That doesn't mean the Fox 9 reporter needs to make an issue of it via Twitter, but as I wrote previously, she doesn't appear to be the most thoughtful person using the social media platform.
The most confusing tweet that D-Mitch dropped seems to indicate that she thinks she's being disrespected because she has a vagina.
What does her gender have to do with anything? I saw no indication that the fact she, presumably, has a vagina had anything to do with Robson's writing or commentary. Perhaps I missed it, but I couldn't find it, and Robson was quick to rebuff her criticism.
He also noted via another tweet that there is some dispute (from another news outlet) about whether or not D-Mitch was the first with the anecdote, which didn't seem to bother her. Her response was "I don't care about that."
Am I reading it wrong? D-Mitch doesn't care if another outlet claims she is being inaccurately portrayed as the first to report a sports factoid? I suppose she could be applauded for not caring about such triviality, but her quick dismissal of the dispute only adds to the appearance that she's petty, and not the sharpest mind using Twitter.
I'm sure I have it all wrong. I'm sure those 95,000+ Facebook users are fans because of her intelligent sports insight.
